The Perspective that Gay Marriage is Wrong Is Based on the following Opinions:
- It Is Not Marriage
Calling something marriage does not make it such. Marriage has dependably been a pledge between a man and a woman which is by its tendency requested toward procreation and instruction of kids, as well as the solidarity and wellbeing of the life partners.
The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something totally diverse. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the undeniable organic, physiological, and mental contrasts in between the men and women which discover their natural design in marriage. It additionally denies the particular main role of marriage: the propagation of mankind and the bringing up of children.
Two totally distinctive things can’t be viewed as the same thing.
- It Violates Natural Law
Marriage is an extraordinary relationship between people. It is a relationship established in human instinct and accordingly represented by its characteristic law.
Common law’s most basic statute is that “great is to be done and sought after, and shrewdness is to be stayed away from.” By his normal reason, man can see what is ethically great or terrible for him. Consequently, he can know the end or reason for each of his actions and how it is morally wrong to change the natural laws.
Any circumstance which systematizes the circumvention of the reason for the sexual demonstration damages characteristic law and the target standard of moral quality.
Being established in human instinct, regular law is widespread and unchanging. It applies to the whole human race, similarly. It has an over all charge and in all, reliably and dependably. Paul, one of the followers of Jesus taught in the Epistle to the Romans that the normal law is recorded on the heart of each man. (Rom. 2:14-15)
- It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother
It is in the kid’s best advantage that he be raised by his normal father and mother. This tenet is affirmed by the apparent troubles confronted by the numerous kids who are vagrants or are raised by a solitary parent, a relative, or a temporary parent.
The lamentable circumstance of these kids will be the standard for all offspring of a same-sex “marriage.” An offspring of a same-sex “marriage” will dependably be denied of either his regular mother or father. He will fundamentally be raised by one parent who has no blood association with him. He will dependably be denied of either a mother or a father’s good example.
Same-sex “marriage” overlooks a tyke’s best advantage.
- It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle
For the sake of the “family,” same-sex marriage” serves to approve such unions as well as the entire gay person way of life in all its indiscriminate and transgender variations.
Common laws are organizing standards of man’s life in the public eye. In that capacity, they play a critical and in some cases unequivocal part in affecting examples of thought and conduct. They remotely shape the life of society, additionally significantly change everybody’s discernment and assessment of types of conduct.
Legitimate acknowledgment of same-sex “marriage” would fundamentally darken certain essential good values, depreciate customary marriage, and debilitate open ethical quality.
- It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right
Gay person activists contend that same-sex “marriage” is a social liberties issue like the battle for racial balance in the 1960s.
This is false.
Above all else, sexual conduct and race are basically diverse substances. A man and a lady needing to wed might be diverse in their qualities: one might be dark, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these distinctions are unrealistic obstructions to marriage. The two people are still man and lady, and along these lines the necessities of nature are regarded.
Same-sex “marriage” contradicts nature. Two people of the same sex, paying little heed to their race, riches, stature, savviness or popularity, will never have the capacity to wed due to an outlandish organic invalid possibility.
Also, acquired and unchangeable racial qualities can’t be contrasted and non-hereditary and variable conduct. There is just no similarities between the interracial marriage of a man and a lady and the “marriage” between two people of the same sex.